Sunday, July 31, 2011

NASCAR: Austin Dillon captures Truck Series win in Nashville







NASCAR truck series Nashville Austin Dillon. LAT PHOTOGRAPHIC
Austin Dillon started Friday night's Camping World Truck Series race on the pole and finished with a win.

By AL PEARCE on 7/22/2011



Pole-sitter Austin Dillon took the lead from Johnny Sauter with 23 laps remaining Friday night and drove away to easily win the Lucas Deep Clean Camping World Truck Series 200 at Nashville Speedway. It was Dillon’s third career Truck Series win (his first this year), all of them from the pole.


Dillon, grandson of six-time Sprint Cup championship owner Richard Childress, led the first 29 of the 150 laps around the 1.333-mile track. Timothy Peters came forward and dominated the middle portion of the race, leading twice for 67 of 73 laps at one point. But Sauter and Dillon restarted ahead of Peters after the next-to-last caution at lap 103, and both drove away from the rest of the field. Dillon led laps 104-106, Sauter led 107-127, then Dillon led the final 23.


Sauter finished a distant second, then Peters, ex-Formula One driver Nelson Piquet Jr., Parker Kligerman, Todd Bodine, James Buescher, David Starr, Elliott Sadler, and second-faster qualifier Joey Coulter. All told, Peters led twice for 67 laps, Dillon four times for 56, Sauter once for 21, Coulter once for four and Cole Whitt once for two laps.


TOP 10 FINISHERS


1. Austin Dillon, Chevrolet


2. Johnny Sauter, Chevrolet


3. Timothy Peters, Toyota


4. Nelson Piquet Jr., Chevrolet


5. Parker Kligerman, Dodge


6. Todd Bodine, Toyota


7. James Buescher, Chevrolet


8. David Starr, Toyota


9. Elliott Sadler, Chevrolet


10. Joey Coulter, Chevrolet


POINTS LEADERS


1. Johnny Sauter, 431


2. Austin Dillon, -18


3. James Buescher, -42


4. Cole Whitt, -43


5. Timothy Peters, -47


6. Matt Crafton, -54


7. Parker Kligerman, -58


8. Joey Coulter, -65


9. Ron Hornaday Jr., -69


10. Todd Bodine, -81


Next event: July 29, Clermont, Ind.


 





AutoWeek loves passionate comments and debate, but remember that you're part of a diverse community. Above all: be respectful. Critique statements, not people; talk about the automotive world, but skip the political rhetoric, hate speech, and obscenities. While we can't read every post, this site is moderated and AutoWeek will remove comments as we see fit. Questions? Read our Terms of Use or email moderator@autoweek.com.






NASCAR: Carl Edwards cruises to Nationwide win in Nashville







nascar nationwide carl edwards. LAT PHOTOGRAPHIC
Carl Edwards celebrates after sticking his landing Saturday night at the Nationwide race in Nashville.

By AL PEARCE on 7/23/2011



Carl Edwards got his fifth Nationwide Series win this year and the 34th of his career in easy fashion in the Federated Auto Parts 300 at Nashville Superspeedway on Saturday night. Edwards led three times for 124 laps in a Mustang from Roush Fenway Racing.


Pole-winner Brad Keselowski led three times for 89 laps before his Dodge Challenger’s engine went soft, leaving him 12th. Only Elliott Sadler (once for three laps before a gear problem left him 30th) and third-place Austin Dillon (twice for nine laps) also led during the 225-lap race at the 1.333-mile track.


Roush Fenway driver Ricky Stenhouse Jr. finished second, with Dillon, Justin Allgaier and Aric Almirola rounding out the top five. Sam Hornish Jr., Drew Herring, new points leader Reed Sorenson, Trevor Bayne and Kenny Wallace completed the top 10.


Keselowski led the first 58 laps and 31 of the next 58 before slowing and slipping back. Edwards, who had led laps 59-82, was virtually unchallenged the rest of the way, leading 121-178 and the final 42 laps, from 184 to 225. Sadler, who started as the points leader and finished third-ranked, led laps 84-86. Dillon, making only his 10th career Nationwide start and third this year, lead laps 117-120 and 179-183.


"I had an unreal car, a super fast car, a really great car," said Edwards, who overcame a pit road speeding penalty en route to winning. "I hate that the 22 (Keselowski) had problems because we were gonna have a heckuva race. They were awfully good until they had their problems. They would have been tough."


Edwards’ win was the 17th in 20 races this year by a full-time Sprint Cup driver. Sorenson, Stenhouse and Allgaier have each won once.


TOP 10 FINISHERS


1. Carl Edwards, Ford


2. Ricky Stenhouse Jr., Ford


3. Austin Dillon, Chevrolet


4. Justin Allgaier, Chevrolet


5. Aric Almirola, Chevrolet


6. Sam Hornish Jr., Dodge


7. Drew Herring, Toyota


8. Reed Sorenson, Chevrolet


9. Trevor Bayne, Ford


10. Kenny Wallace, Toyota


POINTS LEADERS


1. Reed Sorenson, 702


2. Ricky Stenhouse Jr., -5


3. Elliott Sadler, -14


4. Justin Allgaier, -30


5. Aric Almirola, -71


6. Jason Leffler, -94


7. Kenny Wallace, -97


8. Steven Wallace, -144


9. Michael Annett, -152


10. Brian Scott, -165


Next event: July 30, Clermont, Ind.


 





AutoWeek loves passionate comments and debate, but remember that you're part of a diverse community. Above all: be respectful. Critique statements, not people; talk about the automotive world, but skip the political rhetoric, hate speech, and obscenities. While we can't read every post, this site is moderated and AutoWeek will remove comments as we see fit. Questions? Read our Terms of Use or email moderator@autoweek.com.






NASCAR: Richard Childress Racing latest team to make crew chief change

AutoWeek loves passionate comments and debate, but remember that you're part of a diverse community. Above all: be respectful. Critique statements, not people; talk about the automotive world, but skip the political rhetoric, hate speech, and obscenities. While we can't read every post, this site is moderated and AutoWeek will remove comments as we see fit. Questions? Read our Terms of Use or email moderator@autoweek.com.

NASCAR: Scott Speed to return for three races with owner Brad Jenkins

AutoWeek loves passionate comments and debate, but remember that you're part of a diverse community. Above all: be respectful. Critique statements, not people; talk about the automotive world, but skip the political rhetoric, hate speech, and obscenities. While we can't read every post, this site is moderated and AutoWeek will remove comments as we see fit. Questions? Read our Terms of Use or email moderator@autoweek.com.

Saturday, July 30, 2011

NASCAR: NFL agreement prevents Daytona 500, Super Bowl conflict







nascar nfl daytona 500 super bowl LAT PHOTOGRAPHIC
NASCAR moved the 2012 Daytona 500 back one week on the calendar just in case the NFL delayed the Super Bowl.

By AL PEARCE on 7/27/2011



There was a collective sigh of relief in Daytona Beach, Fla., early this week when the NFL and its players settled their well-documented labor dispute. Granted, nobody at NASCAR thought the NFL or its professional football stars would sacrifice the season and hand stock-car racing 12 weekends without any serious television competition. Rather, the real concern in Daytona Beach for months was the timing of the labor agreement.


Would the owners and players shake hands early enough for the 16-game regular season to begin as scheduled on Sept. 11? If not, would they opt for a delayed start, pushing training camps two weeks deeper into the summer, then still play four exhibition games? And the biggest question of all: If the season started late, when would the 2012 Super Bowl take place?


You might recall that NASCAR confirmed next year's Daytona 500 the day before this year's race. That date is Feb. 26, a week later than usual and off of Presidents' Day weekend for the first time in years. The change almost certainly meant that NASCAR expected a later-than-usual NFL start because of labor issues or an expanded 18-game regular season. Either of those, in turn, likely would have meant a later-than-usual Super Bowl. Next year's game remains scheduled for Feb. 5, three weeks before the Daytona 500.


At the time of the announcement, NASCAR senior vice president Steve O'Donnell said the football schedule was a factor.


"We're not going to deny that part of this is dealing with the NFL," he said in February. "Who knows where they'll go with a [proposed, now tabled] 18-game schedule, but we want to get ahead of that. Either way, we think it's the right thing for our season. The Super Bowl is a big event, but so is the Daytona 500. To give fans an opportunity to go to both is the right move. We think it's a win-win for everybody."


Moving the Daytona 500 to the last weekend in February gave NASCAR a safety net it no longer needs. But it gives the year's biggest NASCAR race yet another week away from the hype and hoopla surrounding one of the world's most-anticipated sports events. If the NFL had opened training camps even a few weeks later, its Super Bowl might have been pushed as late as Feb. 26.


If so, the suits in Daytona Beach almost certainly would have moved the 500 to Saturday night, Feb. 25. After all, they're smart enough to know not to put the Daytona 500 on Fox up against the Super Bowl on NBC.


 





AutoWeek loves passionate comments and debate, but remember that you're part of a diverse community. Above all: be respectful. Critique statements, not people; talk about the automotive world, but skip the political rhetoric, hate speech, and obscenities. While we can't read every post, this site is moderated and AutoWeek will remove comments as we see fit. Questions? Read our Terms of Use or email moderator@autoweek.com.






NASCAR: Brickyard 400 loses some luster with fans, not with drivers







nascar indy brickyard jamie mcmurray. ACTION SPORTS PHOTOGRAPHY
Jamie McMurray won NASCAR's Brickyard 400 race in 2010.

By AL PEARCE on 7/28/2011



It was not long ago that the Brickyard 400 at the Indianapolis Motor Speedway stood unchallenged as NASCAR's second biggest race behind only the Daytona 500. The inaugural event in 1994 drew upward of 275,000 fans, leading Speedway officials to quip that they could have sold a million tickets if they'd had enough seats.


The annual midsummer race remained important--although nothing like in its early years--until three or four years ago. But the embarrassing Goodyear tire debacle of 2008 deeply hurt its prestige, and many will argue that the 400 still hasn't recovered.


With 2008 still painfully fresh, attendance and media interest dipped in 2009. Attendance went down again last year, and if race-week rumblings can be believed, it will be down again for Sunday afternoon's 18th-annual race. Some series watchers say officials will be thrilled if a strong walk-up sale on Sunday morning gets attendance into the 100,000 range.


Why the alarming decline in just a few years? Why has the Brickyard 400 become--if not just another stock-car race--something approaching that? Almost everyone who follows NASCAR has opinions, from the 2008 tire fiasco to the economy (travel/lodging/tickets) to the proximity of Kentucky (it hosted Sprint Cup a month ago) and Michigan (which hosts in three weeks) to poor sightlines (but haven't they always been poor?) to boring racing to uninspiring promotion efforts.


On the latter front, officials have urged drivers to step up, check their egos at the gate and help promote this weekend's race as never before.


But even a bad crowd at Indy beats a good crowd at most NASCAR venues. And even a boring Brickyard 400 win beats a thrilling win anywhere except Daytona Beach in February. Such is the prestige still attached to the world's most famous speedway, if not to its second biggest race.


"For us, it's where you bring your latest and greatest car," says Kevin Harvick, a Brickyard 400 and Daytona 500 winner. "It's all about trying to win and putting it on the line. It's a prestigious race, and nobody goes there with any intention other than winning."


Says teammate Jeff Burton, "Being at the Brickyard with NASCAR is an unbelievable experience. The things that are in front of me [in my career] that really mean a lot are winning a championship, winning a Daytona 500 . . . and certainly the Brickyard 400 is on that list as well."


Six active drivers have won Brickyard 400s: Jeff Gordon (four), Jimmie Johnson (three), Tony Stewart (two) and Harvick, Bobby Labonte and defending champion Jamie McMurray (one each). Other winners include retired drivers Dale Jarrett (two), Ricky Rudd and Bill Elliott, and the late Dale Earnhardt (one each).


On-track activities open on Friday with practice sessions from 1 to 2:15 p.m. and from 3:15 to 4:30 p.m. Teams will practice again on Saturday morning from 10 to 11:30 and qualify that afternoon at 2:10. Sunday afternoon's 160-lap, 400-mile race (on ESPN) is scheduled for a 1 p.m. start.


Nationwide, Truck series run nearby


The Brickyard 400 is part of NASCAR's annual three-series, three-race weekend in the Indianapolis area. The Nationwide Series and the Camping World Truck Series have Friday and Saturday night races at Lucas Oil Raceway in nearby Clermont, Ind. Unlike recent years, only a few Cup drivers have entered either of the support races.


Nationwide championship contender Elliott Sadler is the only "outsider" entered in Friday night's AAA Insurance Truck Series 200. Team owner Kyle Busch is skipping it but Josh Richards will drive the No. 18 Toyota as Busch chases his second consecutive owners' championship. Teams will practice at 10 and 11:45 on Friday morning, qualify at 4:40 p.m., and then run their 200-lap, 137-lap race at 7:30 p.m.


X Games superstar and action-sports icon Travis Pastrana is scheduled for his Nationwide debut in Saturday night's Kroger 200. He's undaunted despite less-than-spectacular results in his K&N East Pro Series races, most recently a 22nd two weeks ago at Loudon, N.H. He's also finished sixth, 25th, 33rd and 22nd.


"For me, it's always about a new challenge and finding the most competition," Pastrana said after a recent Late Model test. "I've been talking with [driver coach] Matt Crafton, really working on figuring out how to adjust the car. You might be good at the beginning or end of practice, or good in qualifying or good in the race, but it's so difficult. You have to continue to work with the team to make your car better. It's been a lot of fun and humbling, for sure."


Pastrana will face a fairly manageable field--Carl Edwards and Brad Keselowski are the only Cup stars expected--in the 200-lap, 137-mile race. Teams will practice Saturday morning at 10 and 11:45, qualify at 4:45 p.m., and then race at 7:15 p.m.


 





AutoWeek loves passionate comments and debate, but remember that you're part of a diverse community. Above all: be respectful. Critique statements, not people; talk about the automotive world, but skip the political rhetoric, hate speech, and obscenities. While we can't read every post, this site is moderated and AutoWeek will remove comments as we see fit. Questions? Read our Terms of Use or email moderator@autoweek.com.






NASCAR: Travis Pastrana out of Nationwide Series race with broken foot and ankle

AutoWeek loves passionate comments and debate, but remember that you're part of a diverse community. Above all: be respectful. Critique statements, not people; talk about the automotive world, but skip the political rhetoric, hate speech, and obscenities. While we can't read every post, this site is moderated and AutoWeek will remove comments as we see fit. Questions? Read our Terms of Use or email moderator@autoweek.com.

NASCAR: Kenseth and Biffle lead Brickyard 400 practice at Indianapolis







NASCAR indy Jeff Gordon. LAT PHOTOGRAPHIC
Jeff Gordon rolls out of Gasoline Alley at the Indianapolis Motor Speedway on Friday for practice for Sunday's NASCAR race.

By AL PEARCE on 7/29/2011



The NASCAR Sprint Cup Series Fords of Roush Fenway Racing showed well in both of Friday afternoon’s Sprint Cup practice sessions at the Indianapolis Motor Speedway. Matt Kenseth led the first 90-minute session and teammate Greg Biffle led the second as teams began preparations for Sunday afternoon’s 18th annual Brickyard 400.


Kenseth led the opening session at 181.203 mph. Toyota drivers Kasey Kahne and Denny Hamlin were second and third, Kahne at 181.178 mph and Hamlin at 181.050 mph. Roush Fenway teammates Carl Edwards (180.658 mph) and David Ragan (180.404 mph) rounded out the top five.


Kurt Busch, Juan Pablo Montoya, defending race champion Jamie McMurray, four-time Brickyard winner Jeff Gordon and Jeff Burton were sixth through 10th. The slowest five were Scott Wimmer, former series champion Terry Labonte, Mike Bliss, Robby Gordon and rookie Andy Lally.


Sunday’s 160-lap race at Indianapolis Motor Speedway is the first since Hendrick Motorsports announced that crew chief Kenny Francis would come along when Kahne moves to the No. 5 Chevrolet next year. Kahne and Francis work together at Team Red Bull this year and it’s been generally accepted that Francis will stay with Kahne when he replaces Mark Martin next year.


"I’ve always wanted to work for Hendrick Motorsports and I think anyone who gets into this deal has seen that," Francis said on Friday. "I'm 40 years old, so I remember when I was a kid [Geoffrey] Bodine was driving the No. 5 and [Tim] Richmond was driving it, and I used to watch on TV and think 'man that would be cool to be associated with that one day.' Then the company grew and became the preeminent company in this sport, so it's really an honor to be associated with it and I'm looking forward to it."


Biffle, who ran his car in race rather than qualifying trim, led the second session at 178.310 mph. Martin Truex Jr. in a Toyota was second at 178.172 mph, then Jimmie Johnson in a Chevrolet at 177.669 mph, Casey Mears in a Toyota at 177.289 mph and Kevin Harvick in a Chevy at 177.249.


Edwards, Joey Logano, David Reutimann, Jeff Burton and Brian Vickers completed the top 10 in the second session. Travis Kvapil, Wimmer, Dave Blaney, David Gilliland and David Stremme were the slowest five. Hamlin had an issue in the second session and will now start from the rear of the grid on Sunday because of an engine change.


Teams get a final 90-minute practice session Saturday from 10-11:30 a.m. Eastern, then qualify at 2:10 p.m. Sunday’s race on ESPN is scheduled to start at 1:15 p.m.


 





AutoWeek loves passionate comments and debate, but remember that you're part of a diverse community. Above all: be respectful. Critique statements, not people; talk about the automotive world, but skip the political rhetoric, hate speech, and obscenities. While we can't read every post, this site is moderated and AutoWeek will remove comments as we see fit. Questions? Read our Terms of Use or email moderator@autoweek.com.






NASCAR: Timothy Peters spins to win Truck Series race







nascar truck indy timothy peters. LAT PHOTOGRAPHIC
Timothy Peters leads the field during Friday night's Camping World Truck Series race at Lucas Oil Raceway near Indianapolis.

By AL PEARCE on 7/29/2011



Toyota driver Timothy Peters used his own spin and resulting caution period to make a critical pit stop that helped him win Friday night’s AAA Insurance Camping World Truck Series 200 at Lucas Oil Raceway at Clermont, Ind. It was Peters’ first Truck Series win this year and third of his career, after Martinsville in 2009 and Daytona Beach in 2010.


When Peters spun at lap 91, crew chief Butch Hilton gave him four fresh tires and a full load of fuel. The race was green the last 106 laps--an unprecedented, perhaps record-setting stretch at the track--giving Peters just enough time to rally back toward the front. He passed leader James Buescher (who was in fuel-conservation mode) at lap 195 and easily led the rest of the way, winning by 2.645 seconds.


Buescher, who led twice for 97 laps, finished second, with David Starr, Miguel Paludo and four-time series champion Ron Hornaday Jr. rounding out the top five. Matt Crafton, Joey Coulter, Cole Whitt, pole-winner Austin Dillon and Ross Chastain completed the top 10. Points leader (by only four) Johnny Sauter led once for 44 laps, but a flat right-front tire and subsequent suspension damage left him 23rd among the 34 starters.


Buescher (97 laps) led the most, then Sauter (44), Dillon (the first 36), Parker Kligerman (twice for 16) Peters (the last six) and Bodine (once for one) were the only lap leaders.


Dillon was on the verge of a top-five finish and perhaps the points lead when Bodine wrecked him on the last lap. Dillon called the former two-time champion "an idiot" and Bodine didn’t disagree, saying the accident was strictly his fault.


"He has a right to be mad," Bodine said after his lap-down 12th-place finish. "I just didn’t see him over there. It was my fault all the way."


The race may have been the last in the foreseeable future for the Truck Series at the popular. 0.686-mile bullring. NASCAR is moving its annual Brickyard 400 weekend Nationwide Series race to the Indianapolis Motor Speedway next year. Most series watchers expect NASCAR to also pull its trucks from Lucas Oil Raceway instead of going back for an 18th consecutive year.


TOP 10 FINISHERS


1. Timothy Peters, Toyota


2. James Buescher, Chevrolet


3. David Starr, Toyota


4. Miguel Paludo, Toyota


5. Ron Hornaday Jr., Chevrolet


6. Matt Crafton, Chevrolet


7. Joey Coulter, Chevrolet


8. Cole Whitt, Chevrolet


9. Austin Dillon, Chevrolet


10. Ross Chastain, Chevrolet


POINTS LEADERS


1. Johnny Sauter, 453


2. Austin Dillon, -4


3. James Buescher, -20


4. Timothy Peters, -22


5. Cole Whitt, -29


6. Matt Crafton, -38


7. Parker Kligerman, -46


8. Joey Coulter, -50


9. Ron Hornaday Jr., -52


10. Todd Bodine, -70


Next event: Aug, 6, Pocono, Pa.


 





AutoWeek loves passionate comments and debate, but remember that you're part of a diverse community. Above all: be respectful. Critique statements, not people; talk about the automotive world, but skip the political rhetoric, hate speech, and obscenities. While we can't read every post, this site is moderated and AutoWeek will remove comments as we see fit. Questions? Read our Terms of Use or email moderator@autoweek.com.






2012 Dodge Charger SRT8, an AutoWeek Flash Drive Car Review:








2012 Dodge Charger SRT8 Photo by: A.J. Mueller Photography LLC

2012 Dodge Charger SRT8. Photo by A.J. Mueller Photography LLC.




2012 Dodge Charger SRT8 Photo by: A.J. Mueller Photography LLC

2012 Dodge Charger SRT8. Photo by A.J. Mueller Photography LLC.




2012 Dodge Charger SRT8 Photo by: A.J. Mueller Photography LLC

2012 Dodge Charger SRT8. Photo by A.J. Mueller Photography LLC.




2012 Dodge Charger SRT8 Photo by: A.J. Mueller Photography LLC

2012 Dodge Charger SRT8. Photo by A.J. Mueller Photography LLC.




2012 Dodge Charger SRT8 Photo by: A.J. Mueller Photography LLC

2012 Dodge Charger SRT8. Photo by A.J. Mueller Photography LLC.




2012 Dodge Charger SRT8 Photo by: A.J. Mueller Photography LLC

2012 Dodge Charger SRT8. Photo by A.J. Mueller Photography LLC.




2012 Dodge Charger SRT8 Photo by: A.J. Mueller Photography LLC

2012 Dodge Charger SRT8. Photo by A.J. Mueller Photography LLC.





By JONATHAN WONG on 7/14/2011



What is it?


Ralph Gilles, SRT brand president and CEO, calls the Dodge Charger SRT8 the extrovert of the 2012 SRT8 class--and with good reason. The aggressive SRT exterior treatment includes a gloss black grille, sculpted hood with black air exhauster, rear spoiler and dual four-inch exhaust tips make the car look menacing.


But with any SRT vehicles, it begins with the engine. A new 6.4-liter Hemi V8 powers the menacing sedan, replacing the previous 6.1-liter Hemi V8. With a total of 470-hp and 470 lb-ft of torque on tap, it provides and additional 45 hp and 50 lb-ft of torque over the old powerplant. Power is up, but fuel efficiency also improves with a new active valve exhaust system (as found all 2012 SRT8 models) to allow the Hemi to operate in four-cylinder mode over a wider rpm range. Bolted to the V8 is the tried and true five-speed automatic with manual shift function.


On the suspension front, 2012 marks the additional of a new adaptive damping suspension offering two modes: auto and sport. Auto monitors speed, steering angle, brake torque, throttle and acceleration and adjusts damping accordingly, while sport locks in a stiffer, track-ready setup.


SRT partner, Brembo, provides four-pot brakes at all corners, with the entire package riding on 20-inch, split five-spoke forged wheels with black painted pockets.


Touches in the cabin included the leather-wrapped, flat-bottom SRT steering wheel with paddle shifters, aluminum interior trim and heavily bolstered SRT front bucket seats. An updated Performance Pages readout can be seen on the standard 8.4-inch color touchscreen, which has been upgraded to include steering angle, horsepower and torque outputs and various gauges.


What is it like to drive?


While the Charger SRT8's suspension tuning isn't as aggressive as the Challenger's, it still helped the Charger blaze around California's Willow Springs Raceway with little trouble. In corners, the car stays natural and easily sticks to your desired line and is never a handful. As in the 300 SRT8, with sport mode engaged, the traction aids allow for a good amount of slip before cutting in to kill the party. There's very little roll to speak of in turns, and the Hemi V8 brings plenty of power. Upshifts from the five-speed autobox were quick while using the paddles, but again, the transmission suffers from harsh downshifts without rev matching capabilities. Steering weight is also on the light side. As expected, the Brembo brakes were up to task, easily slowed things down and were good throughout the hot day.


On the road, the Charger SRT8 is quiet and rolls down the ride comfortably. Even in sport mode, the suspension isn't overly harsh with only bigger road hazards able to jolt occupants. In auto, it's even more comfortable.


Do I want it?


If you like standout styling and horsepower (and who doesn't?) then yes, the Charger should be your SRT8 of choice. The variable damping suspension opens the SRT8 vehicles up to a broader audience, while keeping the hardcore enthusiast happy. The new Hemi V8 still sounds the part under wide-open throttle, but is quiet and docile when you're idling around town.


Now if SRT figures out a way to add rev matching to the transmission and tune in a little more weight into the steering, it would really have a winner on its hands.


2012 Dodge Charger SRT8


On Sale: Third quarter 2011


Base Price: $48,000 (est)


Drivetrain: 6.4-liter 470-hp, 470 lb-ft V8; five-speed automatic


Curb Weight: 4,365 lb


0-60 mph: 4.8 sec (est)


Fuel Economy (EPA): 16 mpg (est)


 





AutoWeek loves passionate comments and debate, but remember that you're part of a diverse community. Above all: be respectful. Critique statements, not people; talk about the automotive world, but skip the political rhetoric, hate speech, and obscenities. While we can't read every post, this site is moderated and AutoWeek will remove comments as we see fit. Questions? Read our Terms of Use or email moderator@autoweek.com.






2011 Saab 9-5 Aero, an AutoWeek Drivers Log Car Review:








2011 Saab 9-5 Aero Photo by: David Arnouts

2011 Saab 9-5 Aero. Photo by David Arnouts.




2011 Saab 9-5 Aero Photo by: David Arnouts

2011 Saab 9-5 Aero. Photo by David Arnouts.




2011 Saab 9-5 Aero Photo by: David Arnouts

2011 Saab 9-5 Aero. Photo by David Arnouts.




2011 Saab 9-5 Aero Photo by: David Arnouts

2011 Saab 9-5 Aero. Photo by David Arnouts.




2011 Saab 9-5 Aero Photo by: David Arnouts

2011 Saab 9-5 Aero. Photo by David Arnouts.




2011 Saab 9-5 Aero Photo by: David Arnouts

2011 Saab 9-5 Aero. Photo by David Arnouts.




2011 Saab 9-5 Aero Photo by: David Arnouts

2011 Saab 9-5 Aero. Photo by David Arnouts.




2011 Saab 9-5 Aero Photo by: David Arnouts

2011 Saab 9-5 Aero. Photo by David Arnouts.




2011 Saab 9-5 Aero Photo by: David Arnouts

2011 Saab 9-5 Aero. Photo by David Arnouts.





By WES RAYNAL on 7/15/2011



EDITOR WES RAYNAL: This 2011 Saab 9-5 Aero is a nice car, but is Saab on anybody's radar anymore? It could indeed be a less expensive alternative to the Audi A6/BMW 5-series/Mercedes-Benz E-class cliché, though I wonder how many BMW, Audi and/or Mercedes owners even realize Saab is still in business. Or care.


We'll see how it plays out in the marketplace as Saab hangs on by its fingernails, but the car drives well and I guess it should since it's been roughly 14 years since the old 9-5 came out. The car is roomy and tight, the turbocharged six-cylinder has more than enough power and the ride is smooth. The gearbox is smooth, too, whether using the paddles or not. The seats are among the best in the business, in my opinion, and the dash has the historic Saabness to it.


The question is--under new ownership will Saab be able to get enough buyers into the showrooms for a test drive? If it can they might well be impressed with this car. I'm looking forward to trying the 2.0-liter turbo four-cylinder.


INTERACTIVE ASSOCIATE EDITOR JAKE LINGEMAN: This has a turbocharged V6!? I thought for sure it was a four-cylinder. The 300-hp unit doesn't seem to move the big sedan as quickly as one would think it should. When I was driving last night I was thinking that this four-cylinder is pretty good, but I can't believe it doesn't have a six, because the car is bigger. Surprise, surprise.


The exterior is pretty sharp. The futuristic front end looks good, as does the rear. The xenon headlights that move around curves are pretty cool, too. The only weird part about the outside is the cut of the window. It tapers from front to back giving the profile a strange look.


The interior of the Saab is well done and comfortable, with a little sport thrown in for good measure. The seats are covered with perforated leather. There is good lower back support, good bolsters and it has that extra piece that slides up under your knees. It all makes for a comfortable driving position.


The Harmon-Kardon stereo system booms and the iPod input worked great. It seems much of the interior bits are from the General Motors parts bin, but it's all laid out well.


The thing about Saab for me is that it might not be the best car in its class, but it has some character that most brands don't.


DIGITAL EDITOR ANDREW STOY: Victor Muller is pawning his gold fillings to keep Saab going on a daily basis, yet the company has the gall to ask near $50,000 for a sports sedan with just adequate performance, a monochrome driver information center, no navigation and no back-up camera? I was actually kind of indignant for the first few miles I spent with our 9-5, though that could be due in part to the fact that I'm a former Saab 9-5 owner, and the experience was, ahem, less than satisfying.


But as the drive continued, the car began to show me its various sides and I softened toward the new sedan. First, the interior: Saab seats are, hands down, the best in the business. And I discovered the lack of a multicolor, multifunction nav/XM/etc. display smack dab in the middle of the dash actually caused me to focus even more than usual on the road ahead and the feel of the wheel in my hands.


And the thick, flat-bottomed Aero wheel felt good. It's connected to a well-tuned steering system that brings the Saab around corners with nice progression; I found it neither too quick nor too slow, and the XWD system seemed to complement the steering feel on both sweepers and quick turns. In fact, I tried to overcook it a bit on one backroad left and the lack of drama almost disappointed me.


As for the engine, it felt like a Saab turbocharged six-cylinder. That's the only way I can describe it; not overly potent but if you watch the boost gauge (and thank you Saab for including one, an oversight on many manufacturer's new turbo cars) and drive with an eye toward on-boost engine load vs. rpm, the 9-5 is faster than it feels. All in all it reminds me a lot of the 9-X I drove a few years back. Saab aficionados will be at home here.


I also fell for the look of the car. It's got an almost French fuselage styling to it that reminds me of the Citroen SM. It's not pretty but it's uniquely stylish, and it updates Saab design cues just enough to keep it in the family without appearing dated.


Will it be enough to keep the company afloat? Not likely. But if this is the last new Saab I ever have the opportunity to drive, my memories of the marque will be sweeter than they had been.


EXECUTIVE EDITOR--AUTOWEEK.COM BOB GRITZINGER: Putting aside whether Saab is relevant in the marketplace, I find the 2011 Saab 9-5 Aero quite unique, handsomely styled, Swedish in drive character and just Saabish enough to win my kudos. The car is highly refined in ride and powertrain, with the XWD taking care of any torque steer problems of the past and laying the power down with quiet strength. I'm sure the XWD saps some of the power from the turbo V6, or at least makes it feel a little less powerful, but the car scoots to speed in a hurry once the engine overcomes the initial turbo lag.


The XWD also plays a part in keeping this chassis sharp through the corners--it feels precise and predictable and easy to drive hard. The steering seems overboosted but I think that's a deliberate Saab trait carried over from past cars. Not saying that's good or bad--but it does get the job done. The chassis seems well-isolated and therefore soft but it doesn't seem to suffer from any roll or dive.


I find the car's styling is attractive in a classic sense. I suspect it will still look good once the last payment is made. Inside, the car is functional and offers just the right Saab-style appointments and extras, such as the Saab-centric center-mounted ignition button and mandatory turbo boost gauge, the clean center stack, the huge sunroof covered by a linen sunshade, the well-bolstered leather seats, and flat-bottomed thick leather-wrapped steering wheel. I still miss the artistic Transformer like pop-out cupholders, but I can forgo that stuff for this overall better car.


The only annoyance in my notes is the creaking sound in the lower driver's seat on our test car, seemingly coming from where the seat plastic cladding meets the leather. That'd drive me batty in no time.


MOTORSPORTS EDITOR MAC MORRISON: A $50,000 base price for this Saab appeals to me as much as self-penetrating my cranium with a pitchfork, as there are just too many other luxury cars, sports cars, performance cars--just too many cars, period--that you could drive home in for that transaction price.


But you know what? If it is possible--and sure, that's a big "if"--to put the price aside for a moment, I was happy to spend a couple days behind this flat-bottomed wheel (a nice touch, by the way).


I could compare this car to the finally retired former 9-5, but that Swede's extended life makes such an exercise irrelevant; in car terms, the old 9-5 was a centenarian. This model--perhaps remarkably, perhaps depressingly, depending on your stance regarding the world of Saab--manages to step into the present while retaining some quirky elements well-known to the marque's loyalists.


A confession I have no trouble making: I do not care for the 9-5's exterior lines, specifically from the C-pillar back. It somehow manages to simultaneously yell "Saab" and "Saturn," and perhaps even "'80s-era Jaguar XJS." There does appear to be some airplane influence, as usual, but the package comes together in a disjointed, inelegant fashion I wish its designers had discarded or at least reworked significantly prior to production.


Yet this is a nice car to drive. The engine is smooth; its performance does not overwhelm you, but unlike some of my colleagues I certainly never believed it was a four-cylinder. The entire powertrain is smooth and quiet, and the car responds nicely to driver inputs. "Flowing" is the best word I can summon to describe how the driving experience felt to me. The ride is comfortable, the handling not watered down to benign characteristics and quite surefooted, and I found the steering gave me enough feel and feedback to guide the Saab along smoothly and quickly with little effort. There's certainly a European personality evident, despite the General Motors-backed development history.


I liked the interior, which as other noted offers a nice, comfortable seating position. I did not miss the nav or backup camera screen one bit, and I smiled at some of the carryover quirks, such as the dashboard air vents and matte-finished center stack. If this was not a Saab, I'd have probably felt like the center stack was direct from an unfinished preproduction prototype, but it just looks and feels natural in this car. The remainder of the interior is attractive and provides a relaxing driving/riding environment. Enough so, in fact, that I repeatedly forgot all about the 9-5's outward appearance and simply just enjoyed the ride.


And then I remembered the price…


EXECUTIVE EDITOR ROGER HART: This is the best Saab I've driven. GM did a good job in developing this car for the new owners. The somewhat funky exterior design is rather toned down considering Saab designs of the past, and its looks actually grew on me. The interior was comfortable, extremely quiet and functional. I liked the thick, flat-bottom steering wheel and I really liked the functionality and layout of the center stack and the all the controls. The turbo six is fine in this application, although I was a bit surprised with the amount of lag present. Most turbo cars today have somehow managed to greatly reduce, or eliminate, turbo lag. And it was nice to feel no horrendous torque steer that Saabs of old were known for.


The question of Saab surviving is still in doubt, but in the 9-5 Aero, the company has a solid car on which to sell to hopefully keep the customers coming. Obviously one car, even a solid, $50,000 car, cannot sustain an entire company. It will need more solid, somewhat less expensive products to survive. But if Saab does fail, it won't be because its one main new product was a dog.


2011 Saab 9-5 Aero


Base Price: $50,390


As-Tested Price: $51,385


Drivetrain: 2.8-liter turbocharged V6; AWD, six-speed automatic


Output: 300 hp @ 5,500 rpm, 295 lb-ft @ 2,000 rpm


Curb Weight: 4,156 lb


Fuel Economy (EPA/AW): 20/18.3 mpg


Options: Harmon-Kardon audio system including 11 speakers, 5.1 surround sound ($995)


 





AutoWeek loves passionate comments and debate, but remember that you're part of a diverse community. Above all: be respectful. Critique statements, not people; talk about the automotive world, but skip the political rhetoric, hate speech, and obscenities. While we can't read every post, this site is moderated and AutoWeek will remove comments as we see fit. Questions? Read our Terms of Use or email moderator@autoweek.com.






Friday, July 29, 2011

2011 BMW 535i xDrive Sedan, an AutoWeek Drivers Log Car Review:








2011 BMW 535i xDrive sedan Photo by: David Arnouts

2011 BMW 535i xDrive sedan. Photo by David Arnouts.




2011 BMW 535i xDrive sedan Photo by: David Arnouts

2011 BMW 535i xDrive sedan. Photo by David Arnouts.




2011 BMW 535i xDrive sedan Photo by: David Arnouts

2011 BMW 535i xDrive sedan. Photo by David Arnouts.




2011 BMW 535i xDrive sedan Photo by: David Arnouts

2011 BMW 535i xDrive sedan. Photo by David Arnouts.




2011 BMW 535i xDrive sedan Photo by: David Arnouts

2011 BMW 535i xDrive sedan. Photo by David Arnouts.




2011 BMW 535i xDrive sedan Photo by: David Arnouts

2011 BMW 535i xDrive sedan. Photo by David Arnouts.




2011 BMW 535i xDrive sedan Photo by: David Arnouts

2011 BMW 535i xDrive sedan. Photo by David Arnouts.




2011 BMW 535i xDrive sedan Photo by: David Arnouts

2011 BMW 535i xDrive sedan. Photo by David Arnouts.




2011 BMW 535i xDrive sedan Photo by: David Arnouts

2011 BMW 535i xDrive sedan. Photo by David Arnouts.





Published on 7/18/2011



NEWS EDITOR GREG MIGLIORE: The turbocharged straight-six is an absolute gem of an engine in this 2011 BMW 535i xDrive. The power is smooth and responsive, and 300 lb-ft of torque at just 1,200 rpm is a beautiful thing. This car launches quickly and breezes past slower-moving traffic on the expressway. It reminds me of Detroit Tigers ace Justin Verlander, who just throws 100 mph with an easy motion and seemingly without effort. That's how silky this six-banger is. Add in an eight-speed automatic, and this is a top-shelf powertrain.


The steering offers a connected feel, light at first, followed by more weight. For a two-ton car that's long and reasonably wide, this 5-series handles and maneuvers well. The body and chassis don't get unnerved, even when ripping into turns aggressively. The brakes are strong and return solid bite with little pedal travel.


Silver is perhaps the perfect color for this sleek sedan. It looks gorgeous in the parking lot, and the shape and silhouette present elegantly. Inside is a well-done cabin that's not overwrought. The materials, especially the wood-colored trim and leather, are impressive, and the easy-to read gauges are exactly what drivers with an enthusiast bent seek.


I've driven a lot of variations of the 5-series recently. Really, the 528i is more than adequate, even with its relatively low output compared with its siblings. The 550i--our long-termer--is a hoot, but this 535i is the best choice for family hauling.


ART DIRECTOR CHERYL L. BLAHNIK: I was lucky enough to have two separate stints in this BMW 535i xDrive, and the more time I spend in this car, the more I appreciate it. The exterior is sharp and the interior is also great, with quality materials, clean design and good fit-and-finish throughout. Drive-wise, it's smooth and would be a perfect long-distance cruiser.


But what really sets this car apart are all of the little details that add to this Bimmer's luxury feel. For example, at night when you unlock the doors, there are lights that illuminate the door handles. Another cool feature was the top-view camera.


In the end, this car is the total package with good looks, luxurious interior accommodations and a great ride.


EXECUTIVE EDITOR--AUTOWEEK.COM BOB GRITZINGER: Four punches: 1) the start button, 2) sport on the chassis selector, 3) tranny into DS (S for sport), 4) accelerator to the floor. Do that, and you're rewarded with a cutting-edge precision driving machine at its hard-charging best--quickly winding up to max power, but with an inline refinement that belies the amount of rip built into this big German sedan. Yes, the big V8 550i or an M version might be the top of the mountain, but for most owners, this turbocharged six should be more than adequate.


Set in sport mode, the chassis feels just about right for most spirited driving--I'd save the sport-plus for track driving or for when you're out on wide-open roads where you can get a little sideways without upsetting anyone else's applecart. It's quick and responsive to inputs and seems to beg to be driven, not just pointed from A to B. As such, it makes even the dullest drive a little more enjoyable.


That all that is possible in a relatively large sedan is a tribute to BMW engineering.


I'd also echo the comments about the bird's-eye view backup camera: What a great system, making it possible to "see" all around the car. It's not great in lower-light conditions, such as in a parking garage, but in my driveway, it made backing out between some obstacles a cinch.


DIGITAL EDITOR ANDREW STOY: I'm not feeling it. The 2011 BMW 535i xDrive is precise, capable, reasonably powerful, well-made and utterly soulless. The car doesn't seem to be enjoying the ride and comes across as vaguely contemptuous of having to ferry you about.


Inside is a broad swath of grey highlighted by grey, cold as the Alpine peaks, while outside, this BMW is classically attractive but nothing else.


As far as the powertrain, it was perfectly capable of moving the big sedan at a brisk pace, but for all the smoothness, it was utterly devoid of anything that would get my blood moving.


The good? Outstanding brakes, possibly the best I've ever felt on a large sedan--not just in terms of stopping ability, but also the feel of the pedal underfoot. Also, the heated seats are exceptional, providing even, comfortable warmth from the thighs to the upper back.


Otherwise, I had more fun in the 2012 Acura TL that I was in the night before, and the Honda Odyssey fits my family better--plus both were $20,000 less than this BMW.


2011 BMW 535i xDrive Sedan


Base Price: $53,275


As-Tested Price: $67,875


Drivetrain: 3.0-liter turbocharged I6; AWD, eight-speed automatic


Output: 300 hp @ 5,800-6,250 rpm, 300 lb-ft @ 1,200-5,000 rpm


Curb Weight: 4,233 lb


Fuel Economy (EPA/AW): 23/23.7 mpg


Options: Premium package 2 including rearview camera, power rear sunshade, heated front seats, park distance control, iPod and USB adapter, navigation system, satellite radio with premium hi-fi system ($4,500); dynamic handling package including adaptive drive, dynamic damper control and active roll stabilization ($2,700); Sport package including 19-inch alloy V-spoke wheels, sports leather steering wheel, multicontour seats and shadowline exterior trim ($2,200); cold-weather package including heated steering wheel and heated rear seats ($1,050); comfort access keyless entry ($1,000); side- and top-view cameras ($800); titanium silver metallic exterior paint ($550)


 





AutoWeek loves passionate comments and debate, but remember that you're part of a diverse community. Above all: be respectful. Critique statements, not people; talk about the automotive world, but skip the political rhetoric, hate speech, and obscenities. While we can't read every post, this site is moderated and AutoWeek will remove comments as we see fit. Questions? Read our Terms of Use or email moderator@autoweek.com.






2011 Honda Odyssey Touring Elite: AutoWeek Long-Term Introduction:








By NATALIE NEFF on 7/19/2011



In bold 28-point Akzidenz Grotesk type, the headline boomed: "Best Minivan Ever?" Just asking the question gave our 2008 Chrysler Town & Country (or the "Norge," as we affectionately dubbed the big white box-on-wheels) major credentials.


Somewhere at the crossroads of its comfortable ride, its family-friendly amenities and its flexible interior space, we did find a sort of driving nirvana with the T&C--not the type that satisfies the inner Parnelli Jones, perhaps, but a perfection nonetheless.


It silenced the quality skeptics, too. In the 33,000 miles we'd racked up on the odo--it crisscrossed the country, traversed the Rockies and shepherded all of our dormitory-bound children off to college and home again--never once did we have to spend a night without our dear Norge. It required nothing more than routine maintenance and a replacement tire. Still, we never did manage to convert any Honda Odyssey loyalists.


It was time for AutoWeek to try the Japanese minivan over the long haul. Enter the redesigned 2011 Odyssey, the newest member of our long-term fleet. For all of the advancements introduced by Chrysler--dual sliding doors (yes, there was a day when minivans had but one sliding rear door, on the passenger side), fold-in-the-floor seats, conversion-van-like amenities--it's the Honda that is cited most often by aficionados of minivans as the standard-bearer.


Our particular long-termer hasn't inspired its own nickname (at least, not yet), but it does bring with it a heck of a lot of stuff. We started with a top-trim Touring Elite model, with a base price of $44,030--far north of a new, top-of-the-line Town & Country Limited's starting point of $39,995. But the Odyssey Touring Elite comes standard with almost everything we could want in a minivan. The only options we tacked on were a trailer hitch with two hitch balls and roof rails and cross bars. The grand total came to $45,369.


For all that coin, we do get a nice power and performance setup. Where lower-trim Odysseys make do with a five-speed box, our Honda has the more fuel-efficient six-speed transmission, paired with a 3.5-liter V6 engine turning out 248 hp and 250 lb-ft of torque, with Honda's Variable Cylinder Management system. Our long-termer also gets bigger 18-inch wheels in place of the stock 17s; a full complement of safety features, including six airbags, front-seat whiplash protection and an alphabetic mélange of electronic systems (ABS, EBD, VSA, BA, BSI); a power moonroof, liftgate and sliding doors; GPS navigation with voice controls; a 650-watt sound system with a 15-GB hard drive, and a rear-seat entertainment system.


With all of those goodies and seating for eight (one more than our Chrysler, whose second-row swivel seats allowed for only seven riders), the sign-up sheet for the Honda is filling up fast. A bonus for the more outdoorsy staffers is that the Odyssey has a maximum towing capacity of 3,500 pounds, plenty of pull for a small duck boat or a pop-up camper.


2011 Honda Odyssey Touring Elite


PRICING & OPTIONS


Base (includes $780 delivery): $44,030


As-tested price: $45,369


Options: Trailer-hitch kit, with class II trailer-hitch mount, two-inch receiver, automatic-transmission cooler ($936); roof rails ($210); cross bars ($163); two-inch hitch ball ($15); 17/8-inch hitch ball ($15)


DIMENSIONS


Wheelbase (in): 118.1


Track (in): 68.1 front, 68.2 rear


Length/width/height (in): 202.9/79.2/68.4


Curb weight/GVWR (lb): 4,560/6,019


Towing (lb): 3,500


ENGINE


Front-transverse 3.5-liter/212-cid SOHC V6


Power: 248 hp @ 5,700 rpm


Torque: 250 lb-ft @ 4,800 rpm


Compression ratio: 10.5:1


Fuel requirement: 87 octane


DRIVETRAIN


Front-wheel drive


Transmission: Six-speed automatic


Final drive ratio: 4.25:1


SUSPENSION


Front: MacPherson struts with coil springs, gas-charged shock absorbers, antiroll bar


Rear: Multilink with coil springs, gas-charged shock absorbers


BRAKES/ WHEELS/TIRES


Vented discs front, solid discs rear, ABS with EBD; aluminum 235/60R-18 Michelin Primacy MXV4


FUEL ECONOMY


EPA combined: 22 mpg


TRACK TEST DATA


STANDING-START ACCELERATION


0-60 mph: 7.5 sec


0-quarter mile: 15.8 sec @ 89.3 mph


BRAKING


60-0 mph: 132.4 ft


HANDLING


490-ft slalom: 39.7 mph


Lateral acceleration (200-ft skidpad): 0.75 g


INTERIOR NOISE (DBA)


Idle: 41


Full throttle:74


Steady 60 mph: 67


 





AutoWeek loves passionate comments and debate, but remember that you're part of a diverse community. Above all: be respectful. Critique statements, not people; talk about the automotive world, but skip the political rhetoric, hate speech, and obscenities. While we can't read every post, this site is moderated and AutoWeek will remove comments as we see fit. Questions? Read our Terms of Use or email moderator@autoweek.com.






2011 Mazda RX-8 Grand Touring, an AutoWeek Drivers Log Car Review:








2011 Mazda RX-8 Grand Touring Photo by: David Arnouts

2011 Mazda RX-8 Grand Touring. Photo by David Arnouts.




2011 Mazda RX-8 Grand Touring Photo by: David Arnouts

2011 Mazda RX-8 Grand Touring. Photo by David Arnouts.




2011 Mazda RX-8 Grand Touring Photo by: David Arnouts

2011 Mazda RX-8 Grand Touring. Photo by David Arnouts.




2011 Mazda RX-8 Grand Touring Photo by: David Arnouts

2011 Mazda RX-8 Grand Touring. Photo by David Arnouts.




2011 Mazda RX-8 Grand Touring Photo by: David Arnouts

2011 Mazda RX-8 Grand Touring. Photo by David Arnouts.




2011 Mazda RX-8 Grand Touring Photo by: David Arnouts

2011 Mazda RX-8 Grand Touring. Photo by David Arnouts.




2011 Mazda RX-8 Grand Touring Photo by: David Arnouts

2011 Mazda RX-8 Grand Touring. Photo by David Arnouts.




2011 Mazda RX-8 Grand Touring Photo by: David Arnouts

2011 Mazda RX-8 Grand Touring. Photo by David Arnouts.




2011 Mazda RX-8 Grand Touring Photo by: David Arnouts

2011 Mazda RX-8 Grand Touring. Photo by David Arnouts.





Published on 7/20/2011



INTERACTIVE ASSOCIATE EDITOR JAKE LINGEMAN: I love these little Mazda RX-8s--perfect size for a small guy like me. There's good power from the rotary, and add a few extra horses with the manual transmission, and all is well.


It is a little small inside because of the power seats. Mac said he couldn't even fit in it, and my head was perilously close to the roof, even in the lowest position. That said, the seats are comfortable and well bolstered. The few cloverleaf interchanges I took had me feeling tightly planted in the seat and on the road.


This car has that sweet rotary sound, too. I took the road through the tunnel on my way back to work, just so I could hear it echoing. I'm not going to say it sounded like a Formula One car, but it had a very racy note. I may have even gone through twice.


The gearbox is awesome, tight and mechanical. The throw is short, and the triangle-shaped shifter feels good in the palm. The parking brake is in the proper place right next to it.


It seemed to go through gasoline quickly, but the calculated average is almost 22 mpg on my tank, with a bunch of leadfooters driving, so I guess it's OK.


One of the coolest parts is, when the engine is cold, the tach has red markings into the 6,000s. When it gets warmer, it moves back to 7,000, then once it's all the way warm, it moved back to 9,000. It's a good reminder that the rotary shouldn't be abused when it's not warmed up.


I liked the R3 edition that we had before better, but this is still a fun little ride.


ART DIRECTOR CHERYL L. BLAHNIK: It's been a while since I've been in an RX-8, but I quickly got comfortable after hearing the distinctive engine note from the rotary.


The basic design hasn't changed since this car launched with the bolstered wheel wells. I think Mazda could have pulled off a sportier look with more subtle and cleaner lines. The interior is neat with a spacious-enough back seat accessible via the suicide doors.


Like Jake, I'm a fan of the short throws in the shifter that make the RX-8 feel like a true performance machine. The suspension and snappy steering response also help.


EXECUTIVE EDITOR--AUTOWEEK.COM BOB GRITZINGER: An overnight in this RX-8 brought back a flood of good memories of our old long-termer, a silver-gray 2004 Mazda RX-8 that gave us a year of rotary joy. There are very few cars in general, and even fewer at this price point, that provoke the same kind of aural delight as the RX-8 at 8,000 rpm. The downside is that's where the car is at its best--running in the upper rev range to draw as much torque and power as possible from the 1.3-liter twin rotary. Down below 5,000 rpm, there's not a lot of punch available.


As long as you keep that in mind, and drive accordingly, the RX-8 is blast to zip around in. The steering is super-precise and responsive, the chassis is balanced, the brakes are strong, the shifter and driving position (at least for this five-foot-10-incher) is near-perfect--all good attributes for flinging this car around on tarmac or a nice piece of gravel back road. The car is almost intuitive in drive character, as in where you think you want it go is exactly where it goes.


Toss in the sharply creased front fenders that mimic some of the world's greatest sports cars new and old, the extra set of doors and almost usable back seat, and the RX-8 is a winner for those who need to feed their driving passion without making too many compromises.


NEWS EDITOR GREG MIGLIORE: I absolutely love the Mazda RX-8. It's one of the most fun cars for the money on the market. All of the specs measure up to my tastes perfectly. The curb weight of around 3,000 pounds, the horsepower output of 232 and the simple and sharp six-gear manual transmission all make for an adrenaline-inducing experience.


The layout of the RX-8 is also near perfect. It feels flat, evenly weighted and is tailored for enthusiastic driving close to the ground and at the limit. As others note, this rotary 1.3-liter is a hoot, raw and imposing yet easy to command and ready for constant action. I left it in second gear and hammered all the way to redline, loving the aural pleasures and sound of the acoustic changes as the revs built.


The steering is weighted nicely, and this lithe sports car is seldom upset. Only an abrupt lane change resulted in a touch of nerves, and even then, that's when I was really tossing the car. The cabin is well-laid out with surprisingly good parts and finishes.


The body and styling hang on this car perfectly, like someone engineered the chassis to drive sportily and then devised an appropriate skin with muscles and bulges. If we could get this for the long-term fleet, I'd be overjoyed.


EXECUTIVE EDITOR ROGER HART: This remains one of the best chassis on any car built today, and the steering--with its quick, direct response--is simply outstanding. And while from a pure technological basis, I love the idea of the rotary engine and its three moving parts, this car would be so much more fun with 100 more horsepower. Granted, anything you can rev to 9,000 rpm is fun, but the little rotary runs has nothing down low and quickly runs out of oomph are you approach the redline.


Having said that, the RX-8 has amazing throttle response, a terrific gearbox and outstanding brakes. And as I said before, this is one of the finest neutral-handling sports cars built. It just needs more . . well, we know what it needs. This is still a terrific car.


MOTORSPORTS EDITOR MAC MORRISON: Those of you questioning whether the RX-8 fuel mileage is “OK” need to review our long-term RX8 reports from a few years back. Drive this Mazda hard--and as noted, you pretty much have to--and you can literally see the fuel-tank needle move down before your very eyes. It's the price you pay for this drivetrain. You just need to be aware of what you're getting when you go in on an RX-8. With a 16.9-gallon gasoline tank, the travel range in between fuel stops isn't very long when the car's returning 15 mpg or, often, less.


Along with that, everything else about the car is just as I remember it from the old long-term test machine. Except in this test car, as Jake mentioned, the combination of the moonroof and the power driver's seat made it difficult for me to fit and impossible to find a driving position I actually liked. I'm six-foot-one, not six-six, so don't think I'm a giant, either. I was quite surprised as I climbed aboard to discover this problem, and it was significant enough for me to consider leaving the car behind in favor of either something else or calling a cab for the ride home. So tall(ish) drivers should be aware of this issue, especially if you have any thought of running the RX-8 on a racetrack. There is absolutely no way I could fit in this car, as equipped, while wearing a helmet. Zero chance.


There is plenty of reason to take the RX-8 to the track, too. It remains one of the most well-balanced cars on the market, thanks much to the Renesis rotary engine's small size and light weight, and how that allows Mazda to mount it so far back and low in the chassis. Grip levels are simply remarkable, and driven extremely hard on back roads, the car doesn't seem prone to either understeer or oversteer. It just feels wildly neutral throughout a variety of corners.


That's it's real saving grace to this day, as I find the styling--odd at best when introduced eight years ago--now borders on dated wackiness, and the few years I've been away from this car have not made me any fonder of the Renesis's lack of torque and anything resembling a strong punch when you hammer down. I'm also a bit surprised that in all these years, Mazda hasn't refined what I rate as an average synchronization between shifter and clutch action. The RX-8's setup makes it easy to introduce slight lurches into your shifts no matter how good you are with a manual transmission.


ASSOCIATE EDITOR JONATHAN WONG: Everyone has summed up this car pretty well above. As the resident rotary enthusiast here at AutoWeek, I'm usually the first one to jump onto the soapbox to sing praise for this car. It's kind of nice to have a number of other staffers take care of that before I had to.


Without question, this chassis is one of the best in the business. There is so much composure in corners, and it will obey virtually any command you give it. Point, shoot and you're there. No surprise and always neutral.


Mac mentioned the lightweight and compact dimensions of the rotary engine itself being one of the main reasons for the car's stellar handling, and he's right. The engine is roughly the size of a half keg and is set very far back and low in the chassis for good weight distribution. The suspension on this Grand Touring model isn't as sporty as the R3, but it still does a great job of keeping it connected to the road and isn't overly harsh from a ride-quality standpoint.


In some eyes, the rotary engine is also the weak point of the car, and I can see where those folks are coming from. Its seemingly unquenchable thirst for fuel, its tendency to burn oil (by design) and its dreaded lack of low-end punch are fair sticking points. However, the upsides are also undeniable, too, with the aforementioned weight savings, compact packaging, insane throttle response, its free-revving nature with a 9,000-rpm redline, smooth operation and the unmistakable engine note.


I've said it before and I'll say it again: It takes a particular person to like and want to own one of these engines. Those looking for low-end thrust off the line need not apply here. Weekend road-course soldiers will love the stratospheric redline and response. Combine that with the great chassis, responsive and well-weighted steering, slick-shifting manual gearbox, strong brakes and well-placed pedals, it's a killer combo for someone looking for a car capable of being tracked and offering practicality with seating for four and respectable trunk space (but with a narrow opening).


Here's what makes me sad: I have a feeling that this is the last year of production for the RX-8, and with the 16X still not ready, there will be another down period between the end of the RX-8 and the next rotary-powered car--kind of the like between 1995 and 2003, which was the time frame between the end of the third-generation RX-7's U.S. life and the debut of the RX-8.


Rumors say that the Mazda is looking to take the rotary and combine it with a hybrid system, which I think would be a shame. One thing is for sure: I'm never letting go of my 1994 Mazda RX-7 R2.


2011 Mazda RX-8 Grand Touring


Base Price: $33,055


As-Tested Price: $33,055


Drivetrain: 1.3-liter rotary; RWD, six-speed manual


Output: 232 hp @ 8,500 rpm, 159 lb-ft @ 5,500 rpm


Curb Weight: 3,065 lb


Fuel Economy (EPA/AW): 18/17.8 mpg


Options: None


 





AutoWeek loves passionate comments and debate, but remember that you're part of a diverse community. Above all: be respectful. Critique statements, not people; talk about the automotive world, but skip the political rhetoric, hate speech, and obscenities. While we can't read every post, this site is moderated and AutoWeek will remove comments as we see fit. Questions? Read our Terms of Use or email moderator@autoweek.com.






2011 Acura RDX Tech, an AutoWeek Drivers Log Car Review:








2011 Acura RDX Photo by: David Arnouts

2011 Acura RDX. Photo by David Arnouts.




2011 Acura RDX Photo by: David Arnouts

2011 Acura RDX. Photo by David Arnouts.




2011 Acura RDX Photo by: David Arnouts

2011 Acura RDX. Photo by David Arnouts.




2011 Acura RDX Photo by: David Arnouts

2011 Acura RDX. Photo by David Arnouts.




2011 Acura RDX Photo by: David Arnouts

2011 Acura RDX. Photo by David Arnouts.




2011 Acura RDX Photo by: David Arnouts

2011 Acura RDX. Photo by David Arnouts.




2011 Acura RDX Photo by: David Arnouts

2011 Acura RDX. Photo by David Arnouts.





Published on 7/21/2011



ART DIRECTOR TARA KLEIN: This 2011 Acura RDX is considered a premium vehicle? Wow, could have fooled me. While the Acura RDX does feature a few niceties, it needs an overhaul to get it up to par.


The exterior design is . . . eh. I get a bit confused as I take it all in, moving from the back to the front. The halves seem a bit disjointed, with the extreme angles on the nose not really matching up with the look of the rest of the vehicle.


When I opened the door, Plain Jane greeted me with a typical composition executed with middle-market materials. While the ergonomics were adequate thanks to well-placed controls, I was too busy yawning to be really impressed with just that. I will say that the backup camera had a crisp, clear display, like that of our long-term Honda Odyssey, so that was a plus.


On the road, the turbo churned out plenty of power, making for a bit of fun, but the rough and noisy nature of the ride overshadowed that.


There is so much competition that is far superior to the RDX (even within some nonluxury brands) that I see it getting left in the dust.


DIGITAL EDITOR ANDREW STOY: Ah, 240 hp and 260 lb-ft of torque flowing through the front wheels. That explains why this thing possessed the nastiest case of torque steer I've felt this side of a Dodge Omni GLH-S. Unfortunately for Acura, the RDX didn't feel particularly more refined than the Shelby econobox, either. The engine was remarkably coarse, and while I enjoy turbo whistle, the RDX had more of a water-rushing-through-pipes sound that seemed to come from the footwell. Not pleasant.


Turbo aside, the RDX was loud overall, with plenty of tire and wind noise at highway speeds. The interior was a pit of blackness; the plastics had good texture and grain, but they weren't much better than what you'd expect from Subaru--a company not generally known for premium interiors. And the entire SUV smelled like a sporting-goods store on the inside. It was exactly the scent of new athletic shoes--that's the only way I can describe it.


Another lasting impression the RDX left me with was its appallingly ugly front mug. The nose comes to a point and then falls off below the car, with no spoiler or grille or trim to give it any heft. It looked like the nose of an Amphicar, with its prowlike beak jutting way out over the front wheels.


Did I like anything? The brakes were excellent, with nice pedal feel and very progressive application. Pressure exerted by my foot translated into exactly the stopping action I expected; it seems like a small thing, but it's amazing how many cars get the brakes wrong, even if they have good panic-stopping distances.


Overall, I was as unimpressed with the Acura RDX as I had been impressed by the 2012 Acura TL just a few weeks earlier. There are still some demons to work out in the Acura lineup.


COPY EDITOR CYNTHIA L. OROSCO-WRIGHT: While I enjoyed the MDX that was part of ourlong-term fleet a couple of years ago, this RDX didn't elicit any strong feelings. It's a crossover. It carries you and your stuff in basic comfort; I certainly wouldn't call anything herein luxurious. But it served its purpose over a weekend when I needed space to transport a large graduation cake and to pick up some boxes.


Getting up to speed wasn't much of a chore, but you do have to put your foot into it a bit to get the turbo juices flowing. And the brakes satisfactorily slowed things down. The seats had good bolster. The overall ride was fine, but the crumbling roads upset the suspension quite a bit. I did like the big, clear screen for the backup camera and the nav unit, which was super easy to use.


There's nothing overly exciting about the RDX, from the odd lines of the sheetmetal to the power underhood. If you're looking for this kind of crossover/small ute, you certainly could find something that looks better and is more fun to drive, possibly for less money.


ASSOCIATE EDITOR JONATHAN WONG: Is the RDX a small luxury SUV? I would argue that it's a small entry-level luxury SUV, more compact than the likes of the Audi Q5 and the BMW X3, which are also more expensive. For the cost of this loaded FWD RDX with navigation and satellite radio, you would only get a bare-bones version of the Audi or the BMW.


A more direct competitor in terms of size and content is the Infiniti EX. When compared with that; I would tip my hat toward the Acura for sportier drive character with its tight chassis, responsive steering and muscular brake performance. Except for the front end, I also like the lines of the RDX better than those of the EX, but that's all personal preference. Neither interior is great, but they are nice enough for entry-luxury vehicles with some soft-touch surfaces sprinkled in among quality hard plastics. As with all Acuras, the front bucket seats are great, with good side support.


I will admit that the stiff ride and louder than expected tire noise can get annoying. By the end of a night of motoring around the beat-up roads in my area, I was wishing for more give in the suspension. Of course, the payoff for the stiff suspension is apparent in turns, improving the driving-fun factor. Along with the new grille added during the facelift Acura gave the RDX last year, the brakes, which were already good, got an update.


I'm also a fan of this turbocharged K-series engine. There's actually torque here, which is fun if you make sure to have the wheels on the FWD RDX pointed in your desired direction before rolling onto the throttle. The powerband is wide, and the five-speed automatic delivers quick and seamless shifts. Is there torque steer? Yes, but it isn't terrible at all. You want bad torque steer? Go drive the first-generation Mazda Mazdaspeed 3, and then come to talk to me.


NEWS EDITOR GREG MIGLIORE: The 2011 Acura RDX is a mediocre entry in this segment, considering that so many new crossovers can be loaded up and had for a similar price. The cabin does not feel very luxurious to me. Even basic vehicles can be dressed up with leather and electronics to get a similar result. Upscale crossovers should have differentiating materials in the cabin, and they are mostly absent or too subtle in this execution. Plus, the center console is busy and not very intuitive to use.


That said, this Acura does a lot of things well. The engine is strong and potent for aggressive launches and merging, and the chassis is well done and comfortable. Passengers remarked on the roominess, and the interior is reasonably pleasant aside from the other faults.


The turbo is a hoot, but as others note, the torque steer is, uh, present. It's almost fun, but you really do need to hold on. On the other hand, I doubt that's the feel people want for family hauling.


In general, the RDX is a nice vehicle, but the interior could use a facelift.


2011 Acura RDX Tech


Base Price: $36,880


As-Tested Price: $36,880


Drivetrain: 2.3-liter turbocharged I4; FWD, five-speed automatic


Output: 240 hp @ 6,000 rpm, 260 lb-ft @ 4,500 rpm


Curb Weight: 3,752 lb


Fuel Economy (EPA/AW): 21/22.4 mpg


Options: None


 





AutoWeek loves passionate comments and debate, but remember that you're part of a diverse community. Above all: be respectful. Critique statements, not people; talk about the automotive world, but skip the political rhetoric, hate speech, and obscenities. While we can't read every post, this site is moderated and AutoWeek will remove comments as we see fit. Questions? Read our Terms of Use or email moderator@autoweek.com.






Thursday, July 28, 2011

2012 Lexus GS 350 prototype, an AutoWeek Flash Drive Car Review :







2012 Lexus GS 350 test drive Lexus
The 2012 Lexus GS 350 was disguised for our early test drive.

By MARK VAUGHN on 7/22/2011



What Is It? No, it is not the all-landau-bodied GS. That is camouflage to keep prying eyes away from discovering the truth about Lexus' attempt to get some sales out of its flagging GS line. A total of about 7,000 sales a year is not acceptable to the luxury division, and Lexus hopes that changes to the GS will improve those figures.


Lexus called this prototype a new platform, but it has the exact same 112.2-inch wheelbase as the current car. The new GS is lighter by 157 pounds, at 3,638, and it gets more spot and laser welds to stiffen it up. There are changes to the suspension geometry and to electronic systems such as Adaptive Variable Suspension and Lexus Dynamic Handling. And one model has four-wheel steer. The goal is to make it competitive with sports sedans such as the BMW 5-series, the Audi A6 and the Infiniti M37. We were offered no specifics about horsepower, but Lexus says that the new car's 3.5-liter V6 will have more of it, while getting better gas mileage. The current GS 350 makes 303 hp and 274 lb-ft of torque while returning 22 mpg combined city and highway, so we figure the new car will have at least 304 hp, 275 lb-ft and 23 mpg.


How Does It Drive? Lexus put together a very tidy driving experience for us, combining city streets, an autocross course and a respectably twisty mountain road. In the city, the GS 350 showed that it still had all of the quiet and comfort for which Lexus is renowned. There is more headroom front and rear and a lower hip point for the driver.


On the autocross course, we put the Drive Mode Select into sport-plus and tried like crazy to get the rear end to come out, this being rear-wheel drive and us thinking we were do-rifto kings. But all we could do was make it understeer, even with the current and (we assume) prototype car's 52/48 front/rear weight balance. Despite Lexus's claims that the electronic controls allow more slip in this new version, we were danged if we could get it very much out of line. That's probably good for Lexus buyers, who value predictability and stability above all else. Similar hamstrings kept the IS from being as much fun as it could have been when it debuted.


Finally, we discovered that the off switch for all of that electronic stability stuff was covered under black camo tape on the dash. We peeled it back and held the switch down for three to five seconds, and then . . . a little oversteer. That was because we were in the upscale model of the two GS 350 prototypes we drove, and that model had four-wheel steer. The 4WS does, indeed, keep this car in line very well and increases cornering grip by a huge factor. So we got into the prototype without the 4WS, peeled back the tape, held down the switch, and--woo-hoo--watch out, Rhys Millen and Tanner Foust. With all of that stuff shut off, the car was really fun, hanging the tail out as long as we wanted to hang it out. Although it still took a focused effort to do so, once we got the rear out, it was easy to keep it there, countersteering into the turn like Drift King Tsuchiya himself.


Then we headed up to the mountain road. Again, the 4WS car proved to be much faster through corners, as you would expect. That stability and speed meant less braking entering the corners. On the straights between turns, the 3.5-liter V6 (if that is indeed what's under the hood) responded with alacrity. The new car has the same 5.7-second 0-to-60-mph time as the current model. The controls on the six-speed automatic could be cranked up for quicker upshifts and for nicely matched throttle blips on downshifts.


It was good on the mountains but not great, as if Lexus had tried again to make a decent car great through tuning and tweaking of the electronic systems instead of starting out with, say, a 5-series chassis. As such, it still might fall short of performance sedans in the segment, at least as far as performance goes. Those looking for Lexus attributes such as quiet and comfort won't be disappointed and might be surprised and delighted to find how responsive the new GS is.


Do I Want It? If quiet and comfort are a priority--but you might want to have some fun occasionally--you might like this attempt by Lexus to make the GS more sporty. But if you're a 5-series/A6/M37 buyer, it might not be sporty enough. You decide; you're the buyer.


Look for a teaser photo to be released to the media Aug. 4, the gasoline version of the Lexus GS 350 to be revealed at Pebble Beach, the hybrid at Frankfurt and an F-Sport at SEMA. Somewhere around there, we'll get more specs and pricing and will drive a production version without the vinyl camo cladding, although we kind of liked the camo cladding.


 





AutoWeek loves passionate comments and debate, but remember that you're part of a diverse community. Above all: be respectful. Critique statements, not people; talk about the automotive world, but skip the political rhetoric, hate speech, and obscenities. While we can't read every post, this site is moderated and AutoWeek will remove comments as we see fit. Questions? Read our Terms of Use or email moderator@autoweek.com.






2012 Volkswagen Eos Komfort, an AutoWeek Drivers Log Car Review:








By JON WONG on 7/22/2011



EXECUTIVE EDITOR ROGER HART: I really dislike labeling a car masculine or feminine, but I really came away feeling that this 2012 Volkswagen Eos is a perfect car for a female. Maybe it has to do with all the rounded, curvy styling features and the lack of any real excitement when you step on the throttle. Maybe a manual gearbox would help give the Eos a more sporting attitude?


The top operation is straightforward, but without any rear wind deflector, there was quite a bit of movement from back to front. The pop-up front deflector does make quite a bit of difference in the amount of wind that buffets front-seat passengers.


While I didn't dislike my time in the Eos, I could never imagine owning one.


EDITOR WES RAYNAL: So the Eos gets the facelift the Jetta got with the more horizontal grille--I liked the old chrome front end better.


I do like the powertrain a lot—I've written volumes on how good I think this VW Group 2.0-liter turbo four is--and with the top up, the car is quiet. I was impressed with the lack of chassis shake. It's perfect for cruising but not necessarily for flinging around. The cockpit is generic VW, with good build quality, fine materials and good ergonomics. Oh, and terrific seats.


The retractable hardtop cuts into the trunk and cramps rear passengers, but then, they all do.


I liked it better than I thought I would overall.


ART DIRECTOR CHERYL L. BLAHNIK: I was lucky enough to have two separate stints in this 2012 Volkswagen Eos, and I have to say that this is a cute little car. Top operation is easy enough that my four-year-old niece was able to lower it without any direction from me.


The interior design is simple, with plenty of legroom up front. Materials and the fit and finish are typical VW high quality. There's very little wind and road noise with the hardtop up, which I doubt would be the case with a conventional soft top.


On the road, the Eos handles well, but I wouldn't be against a little more power from the turbocharged four-cylinder to add to the fun factor. As Roger said, a manual gearbox may help give the car a more spirited feel.


2012 Volkswagen Eos Komfort


Base Price: $34,765


As-Tested Price: $34,765


Drivetrain: 2.0-liter turbocharged I4; FWD, six-speed dual-clutch sequential manual


Output: 200 hp @ 5,100-6,000 rpm, 207 lb-ft @ 1,800-5,000 rpm


Curb Weight: 3,569 lb


Fuel Economy (EPA/AW): 25/24.8 mpg


Options: None


 





AutoWeek loves passionate comments and debate, but remember that you're part of a diverse community. Above all: be respectful. Critique statements, not people; talk about the automotive world, but skip the political rhetoric, hate speech, and obscenities. While we can't read every post, this site is moderated and AutoWeek will remove comments as we see fit. Questions? Read our Terms of Use or email moderator@autoweek.com.